Focusing In: Adderall and Baseball

By Bryan Holcomb
Managing Editor

The Orioles made news last week, but not for the reason fans hoped. Rather than clinching the division, the O’s lost one of their power bats in Chris Davis, who was suspended 25 games after testing positive for amphetamine use. Although he was having a sub-par season overall, posting only a .196/.300/.404 line, he managed to hit 26 home runs, and that power will be missed dearly come October.

The fact that he was suspended for amphetamines stirred up plenty of debate on the internet. Many point to the fact that “greenies” were once not only legal, but commonly used among baseball’s best. That may be true, but the reality is that these substances, whatever you want to call them, are illegal now, and a failed test creates consequences.

There are many who posit that amphetamines shouldn’t be illegal. Adderall, the argument goes, has no physical effects in the game. That Davis took Adderall should not have affected his power last year, nor his power this year. This is a shaky argument at best. While it is true that Adderall does not develop strength more quickly than HGH or other steroids, it does provide a boost of energy. According to a CBS Sports report, Adderall provides a controlled energy burst, and is strong enough to warrant the DEA classifying it in the same category as cocaine. The effects of an energy burst in a game where action takes place in short stints are pretty apparent: swinging faster and running harder.

More than any other sport, though, baseball requires mental focus. It’s the norm for players to spend hours studying the scouting report of pitchers, and it’s very easy to lose focus. Adderall has also been a recent problem in the NFL, where players are also required to watch substantial amounts of film. Within the game, the need to focus is much higher than any other sport. At-bats may seem short, but the time between every pitch is spent recalling the pitcher’s scouting report, attempting to guess what the next pitch will be, and accounting for the situation (runners on base, outs, defensive alignment, etc.) Having artificial help in preparing for each at-bat dramatically facilitates this mental task — and gives an advantage over those who have not.

That being said, Adderall is not completely illegal in baseball, like other performance-enhancing drugs. All it requires is a prescription — which is surprisingly easy to get. According to CBS, about 4.4 percent of the adult population requires Adderall, yet 9.9 percent of Major Leaguers carry a prescription. Davis even had one in 2013; he just forgot to renew it this year.

Chris Davis is not the only guilty party here. He is just the most recent, and the most prominent, in a list of players receiving suspensions for Adderall, even as the list of exemptions granted continues to grow longer each year. While Adderall might not be quite as potent as HGH, the performance-enhancing effects are there — both physically and mentally, and certainly affect how the game is played.

With numbers like Ichiro and Clemente, Houston must utilize Altuve

By Mike Griffin
Staff Writer

There are few things more exciting in the sports world than watching a talented player become a star. If the player in question plays for your favorite team, it gives you a sense of satisfaction that can only be topped by a championship. Even if you dislike the team on which the star plays, there is a feeling of excitement that comes from competition and seeing the game played well. Even as a Yankee fan I remember feeling that sensation watching Dustin Pedroia become one of the best players in the game. It’s just something you have to respect.

This season, one player in particular has, after a period of moderate success, become a bona fide star. He leads the league in batting, and is having a season that is reminiscent of Ichiro’s in 2000. However, this particular player has received little attention during a season full of close divisional races and excellent pitching performances. Despite the superlative nature of his bat and glove, he is mostly unseen to casual fans of the game. His name is Jose Altuve, and he plays second base for the Houston Astros.

Altuve is in his fourth year, and after a period as a serviceable everyday infielder for the Astros, the perennial bottom-feeder with stints in both the National and American Leagues, has managed to become the centerpiece of what is shaping up to be a bright future for Houston. Hitting in front of the likes of powerful hitters such as George Springer, Jon Singleton and Chris Carter, Altuve’s lack of power is an asset, not a detriment, and his ability to reach base regularly has become invaluable. At this point, he leads the majors in batting average and hits, and the AL in steals.

There is another interesting element to Altuve’s career trajectory. In a sport obsessed with its own history, where, as I mentioned in a previous piece, a player is never the best, but rather the best since, Altuve’s career bears striking resemblance to that of another star who was under-appreciated in his time: Roberto Clemente. Altuve is physically similar to Clemente in many ways; an excellent hitter and fielder with limited power and a diminutive frame. From a statistical perspective, however, he is better. Through this point in his career, he is ahead of Roberto’s pace in hits, doubles, runs, WAR, oWAR, steals, and OBP (he is ahead of Clemente’s On Base Percentage by 30 points). He has been in two more All Star Games, and is also injury-free, unlike Clemente, whose bad back gave him constant pain and put him on the disabled list for long stretches.

Clemente’s career was defined by his striving to overcome the circumstances of his life in Pittsburgh: a press that dogged him (they called him Bobby, despite his insistence on Roberto), a team that underachieved, and the failure of the American public to recognize his many accomplishments. He made it to the World Series only twice during his 17-year career (winning both), posted a .362 batting average and took home an MVP award. For most of his career, he was an outstanding member of a mediocre team, and in this way Clemente and Altuve are very much alike.

There is one notable exception. Free agency did not exist during Clemente’s career. He stayed in Pittsburgh because he had no other option. In modern baseball the allure of stardom, money and a more impressive legacy causes team loyalty to play second fiddle. Despite my steadfast belief in the sanctity of the game, and the preservation of its best elements, I have no problem with free agency. There is nothing wrong with players taking their talents to the places where they will be financially appreciated the most. While I respect the class of Derek Jeter, and love him dearly, I understand that it is not good for the game to have the best players play their entire career in obscurity and frustration like Clemente did.

But as okay as I am with free agency, and as good as it is for the game, the process spells doom for the Houston Astros. As a ball club in the middle of the payroll pack, they have Altuve under contract for four more years. After that, his bat will draw the attention of teams with deeper pockets and better playoff chances. His skill set, which ages well, gives him the potential to become a regular All-Star and one of the best players of his generation. But if Houston does not improve in the short term, he may dedicate his best years for a team that can succeed around him.

Houston’s offense has developed exponentially over the course of this season. After a 2013 season in which they were near the bottom of every major offensive metric, they have improved to a young, offensively average ball club, one that has gone .500 since the All-Star Break. They have young power (They are fourth in the Major Leagues in home runs) and terrific potential, especially when you consider the fact that they start only one player older than 27. When you combine the offense with a starting rotation that has been more than acceptable this year, despite having only one starter with an ERA under 3.50 from 2011 to 2013, you can see that this a team with the potential to become a contender.

But the big question is how soon will the potential become a reality? The Astros have already missed out on Masahiro Tanaka and Jose Abreu, two players who could have transformed the franchise and didn’t enter the bidding wars for Yasiel Puig or Yoenis Cespedes, the latter of which was signed by an Athletics team that had less money to spend than the Astros do. Unless they start to realize just how close they are to being a contender, and become comfortable with spending money like a playoff squad, then Jose Altuve’s future in Houston, and the future of the Astros as an organization, will not be totally optimistic.

MLB’s hand is forced to take a unique approach to its biggest problem

By Ben Fidelman
Editor-in-Chief

There is one major negative stigma attached to each of the four major American sports. Football faces the issue of long-term health effects of its constantly violent game. Fighting and excessive hitting are topics that plague hockey, and basketball deals towards more off-the-court issues such as conduct, drugs, and alcohol. Baseball has steroids.

If you were a commissioner of a professional sport, which of those issues would you rather have to deal with?

Quite simply, baseball is the only one whose major issue hasn’t been something that’s ingrained deeply into the fundamental structure of the game. Who would watch football if hits were capped at a certain intensity? How many viewers would stop watching hockey if there were no fights or open-ice checks? What would basketball do if the NBA heavily censored the colorful characters that take the court every night?

Baseball would survive perfectly today without steroids, and is working actively to get to that state. The others, would not. It’s why baseball villainizes these performance enhancing drugs — taking it so far as to wage war against some of the game’s biggest stars — while other sports are largely still wrestling with what direction they want to go with their issue.

Another difference between baseball and the other sports is that steroid use isn’t a tangible in-game act that can be punished. You can give a football or hockey player 15-yards or five minute major for a high hit, but baseball doesn’t have that option. In the Biogenesis suspensions there weren’t even positive tests — all were from non-analytical grounds. It’s a very public, and long, suspension process for steroid use, and Major League Baseball is okay with that.

That the MLBPA and management have gotten out ahead of this issue is commendable. The sport has gone longer without a work stoppage than any other professional sport, while continuing to make aggressive strides to rid the game of PEDs. With the current collective bargaining agreement coming to an end in 2016 it will be interesting to see if baseball can keep ahead of this problem, and police the sport better than any other league in the world.

Cy Young Profile: Felix Hernandez

Over the course of the next few weeks we will be doing profiles of some of baseball’s best pitchers, and candidates for both the AL and NL CY Young Awards. This spotlight is on The King, Felix Hernandez.

By the Numbers

Felix Hernandez has unarguably been one of the most dominant pitchers in the game this season. His 1.99 ERA leads the American League and his 197 strikeouts tie for second in the AL with Cy Young rival Corey Kluber. His 6.2 WAR already marks an MVP-type season even with well over a month remaining.

Much of his success has come from keeping the ball in the park, as Hernandez has posted a miniscule 0.39 HR/9. He’s kept the ball in the zone as well, walking only 1.55 batters while striking out 9.57 per nine. He’s also been effective at keeping runners off the basepaths, as opposing hitters are batting .193 against him, and his WHIP is only 0.87, both leading the league. No other pitcher, save maybe Kershaw, has had the success that Felix has, and I would be surprised if somebody else gets the AL Cy Young come November.

-BH

Via rotoscouting.com

Notable Games

Felix Hernandez is the favorite to take the Cy Young Award, the result of a truly remarkable run this season. Of his impressive statistics, however, there is one that stands out from the rest: 16 starts in which he pitched at least seven innings and gave up two or fewer runs. While this feat would be impressive even if he were pitching to the Padres every trip to the mound (only one start was against the Padres) nine of these starts have been against teams with a .500 record or better, including the last six in a row. Half of his opponents have been in the top ten in the league in runs scored.

Hernandez’s two losses during this stint have put his team’s sputtery offense on display. The first was against the Texas Rangers, where the mediocre pitching of Nick Tepesch (4-7, 4.29 ERA) managed to hold the Mariners scoreless for six innings before the Rangers slightly more competent bullpen held Seattle hitless for the next three.

The second was a pitchers duel between another pitcher that Felix is battling for the AL Cy Young, in Corey Kluber. Hernandez happened to be on the losing side of Kluber’s masterpiece, his best start of the year; a complete game shutout on 85 pitches. This made Hernandez’s quality outing (seven innings, two runs, five hits) pale in comparison. Something that won’t show up on the game logs is that Hernandez is the ace of the best pitching staff in baseball, a distinction that is often associated with the Cy Young Award.

-MG

 

Innovative marketing strategies could put baseball ahead of competitors

By Ben Fidelman
Editor-in-Chief

Major League Baseball is known for embracing its history, both on the field and in the record books, better than any other sport on earth. Although this is an important quality of baseball, one of the greatest issues the game is facing is how to engage younger generations in their youths and draw them in for life.

This sport isn’t one that takes change on the field easily (see instant replay and home plate collision rule backlash), so I believe the way to go will be from the marketing and fan experience side of the game.

It’s always been at the top of owners’ minds to give patrons the best fan experience possible, but what’s becoming evident that simply having a luxurious stadium won’t get the job done. Three or four years after a stadium is built, the features that made the stadium unique upon opening will be old news.

A new concept that has come to mind is something that involves an olive branch from the owners to the fans, and doesn’t involve popping out a billion-dollar stadium every 15 years. This solution will be attractive to fans because it will save them money, and to the owners because it will expand the number of people with eyes on the sport that is bringing in hundreds of millions of dollars for them every year. It’s called transparent pricing.

It’s a simple idea that will see in-park concession prices drop substantially, making it more affordable for fans and families to attend games. According to the 2014 Team Marketing Report, the average total cost of attending a MLB game for a four-person family is 213 dollars, meaning that for many families heading to the ballpark is a once-a-season affair.

Food and drink alone make up about half of that total. Major League owners taking the step to lower prices on concessions will lessen the financial burden of going to a ballgame, and renew a sense of loyalty among the child-bearing generation — definite step that’s needed to capture younger fans.

The novel part of this is where “transparent” comes in. When the team cuts down the price of concessions, it will promise to invest all of the remaining money spent on concessions directly to payroll. This gives fans incentive to eat and drink more while in the stadium (it would have a direct impact in helping raise the amount of money the team would have available to spend on players), along with creating a seemingly personable relationship between fan and team. Every fan that attends a game will know that they personally invested in the on-field product.

Executives can make more finances public, so fans can see their spending at work, as opposed to the current landscape where you have no idea where your cash goes once you buy a bratwurst.

Looking at this concept with a wide lens is important. Teams — not to mention baseball as a whole — would benefit from the more loyal fan bases, along with the fact that the trip to the park would become more affordable, giving more families the chance to come spend money on their products. Teams with more fans in the stadium tend to have the same upward growth in television markets, which is where the real money is to be made anyways. A larger television contract would generate substantially more revenue for a team than what it was losing simply on food and drink revenues.

Breaking the bonds of a tradition-bound sport isn’t something that feels natural when you first look at it. Though in baseball’s case, remember that demographic change is something that has already been conquered by many of its competitors.

Cy Young Profile: Johnny Cueto

Over the course of the next few weeks we will be doing profiles of some of baseball’s best pitchers, and candidates for both the AL and NL CY Young Awards. The next spotlight is on Cincinnati Reds right-hander Johnny Cueto.

By the Numbers

Cueto has certainly been impressive statistically. His 15 wins lead the NL, and his elite 2.06 ERA and 0.91 WHIP each sit at second in the league, trailing only Kershaw in both categories. What’s more impressive, however, is that he has had such success while throwing over 50 more innings than Kershaw, who missed portions of the season to injuries. Upon further examination, however, Cueto appears to be heavily aided by good fortune this season, and will almost certainly face some regression as this 2014 campaign continues. Although his ERA is low, Cueto’s FIP is 3.19. This marks the second-luckiest difference in the NL, behind only teammate Alfredo Simon. His BABIP of .225 is well below his career mark of .275 as well as the league average of .294. No matter the methods, however, the results have been good, and when searching for the most effective pitcher in each league, results are the bottom line.

-BH

Notable Games

If there was one word to describe Johnny Cueto’s season, it would be consistency. In twenty-six starts this year, which is tied for the major league lead, he has been knocked out before the sixth innings only once, in a game against the Phillies where he also surrendered four runs. Those four runs were the most he’s given up in any one start this year. Other than that anomaly, he is established as an intimidating presence on the mound. Cueto has thrown four complete games, tied for the second most in baseball, of which two were shutouts, also tied for second most.

His already exceptional season has been punctuated by a particular dominance of the Pirates. While Cueto has been fantastic against the NL Central in general (5-1, 1.92 ERA in seven starts), three of those wins came against Pittsburgh, as well as two of his complete games, one of which was a shutout. During that shutout, he struck out a career high twelve, of which eight were caught looking. As Thom Brennaman, the Reds’ TV announcer said, it was the result of a cut fastball that is all but unhittable when it is working. Those two starts also came back-to-back, which accounted for much of the hype that surrounded him in the early season.

Overall, Cueto has been a lethal strike thrower for a team that is often not entirely behind him offensively. As was mentioned before, he has given up more than three runs only once, but his record does not reflect that. At 15-6, he leads the majors in wins but is tenth in winning percentage, which is definitely connected to his team’s lack of production at the plate. Nonetheless, this year he has emerged as the bona fide ace of the Cincinnati staff, and a viable Cy Young candidate for the first time in his career.

-MG

Cy Young profile: Chris Sale

Over the course of the next few weeks we will be doing profiles of some of baseball’s best pitchers, and candidates for both the AL and NL CY Young Awards. The first spotlight is on Chicago White Sox left-hander Chris Sale.

By the numbers

Statistically, Sale has been one of the most dominant pitchers this season. His ten wins are impressive, but don’t put him ahead of other contenders in the AL Cy Young race. He gains that advantage in his rate stats, headlined by an outstanding 2.14 ERA, which is second only to Felix Hernandez. His ERA isn’t due to a lot of good luck either, as his FIP sits at 2.35, also second best. Much of this success is due to outstanding command, striking out 10.18 while only watching 1.62 batters per nine innings. He leads the American League in K%-BB%. He doesn’t allow many baserunners either, with a WHIP of only 0.89, and when he does allow contact, the ball tends to stay in the park, with his 0.52 HR/9 rate. Whether you look at traditional or more advanced stats, Sale is among the best in the league, and at only 25 years old, he has a lot of room until he reaches his ceiling.

-BH

Notable games

Sale has been unbelievably effective this season. He has allowed more than three earned runs only twice through 18 starts in this 2014 campaign. But this generally excellent season has been punctuated by four absolutely dominant outings; two complete games and two eight innings shutouts.

The first complete game came against the San Diego Padres. Sale struck out nine, only allowed two hits and one run, retiring the final 14 batters he faced. He did all of this on only 100 pitches. The outing capped a streak of 25 innings, over four starts, in which he had allowed only two earned-runs. His second complete game came against the Mariners, who started six left-handed hitters. He struck out twelve, including the Mariners’ first three batters six times over twelve plate appearances. He only allowed one run, and allowed no walks in either of his complete games.

He also threw two eight-inning shutouts, which might be more impressive. During those two starts, against the Twins and Royals, he struck out a total of 18, including twelve against Kansas City. However, these outings do no illustrate how impressive Sale has been on a consistent basis for the White Sox. He has thrown fewer than six innings only twice, and in one of those he retired the first nine batters he faced, striking out four, but was pulled because of a rain delay. Chris Sale is putting together a career year, and making a strong case for the Cy Young in the process.

-MG

Wrapping up

Sale plays in one of the least offensively threatening divisions in baseball, with only one elite lineup in Detroit. That will be taken into consideration when comparing against arms in the other AL divisions, where pitchers face a much higher quality opponent on a daily basis.

When it’s all said and done, Sale has been a premier power arm since entering the league in 2010, and is probably under-appreciated with his team not being considered a contender since he has been on the roster. As is the case in college football with the Heisman Trophy, it will be unlikely to see Sale win the Cy Young without more backing from his squad. Can you imagine his confidence and drive (not to mention statistical improvements with a better defense) if he had playoff-caliber talent backing him every day?

-BF

Bud gets what Bud wants: new commish coming

By Ben Fidelman
Editor-in-Chief

Don’t be fooled everyone, it’s just politics as usual.

As MLB Commissioner Bud Selig’s term in office inches closer to completion, there is much attention being drawn to the process in which his replacement is being selected. Although Selig urged owners and other baseball executives to keep quiet about the selection period, stories of a late push for one of three finalists are surfacing.

A vote will be held on August 14 that will give the owners their first shot at electing a new leader, but many speculate that some of the most powerful men in baseball are simply playing for a push.

A group of owners, led by the White Sox’s Jerry Reinsdorf, Angels’ Arte Moreno, and Red Sox’s John Henry, are trying to scrounge together enough votes to block the vote — 23 of 30 ballots are needed to win the commissionership — from landing a successful heir to Selig’s office.

It has been reported that Reinsdorf doesn’t genuinely want the candidate he is backing (Red Sox Chairman Tom Werner) to win the commissionership, but is frustrated at the mindset the seven-man selection committee had about the candidates. He felt they came in focused on one name — MLB chief operating officer Rob Manfred — instead of having a truly open mind. Manfred is viewed to be the odds-on favorite to win, and Selig’s pick to replace himself.

No matter what the projections are, to get his point across Reinsdorf is hitting the phones to recruit owners for the necessary eight votes to at least block an election on Thursday.

My take on the matter relates to Selig’s time as commissioner as a whole. What he did better than anyone else wasn’t just getting votes to fall the way he wanted — but getting it done in unanimous fashion. Although this vote looks like it will be closer to 23-7 than 30-0, I don’t believe that this, one of his last votes, will fall far from his average. Expect a successful election in Baltimore one way or another on Thursday — because Bud gets what he wants.

Why Does Derek Jeter Matter?

By Mike Griffin
Staff Writer

(Disclaimer-this article was written by a die-hard Yankee fan who had just seen Jeter play for the final time. It is soaked in his tears.)

I was a terrible hitter in Little League. My dad, who wanted me to improve but was never really a baseball skills guy, sent me to a fundamentals clinic in Manhattan. The first time I went there, I was told to hold the bat higher up, and bring it down directly on the ball instead of hacking at it as I had been doing. I should, the coach said, watch Derek Jeter. The way his hands were high behind his head. The way he kept his head inside the ball. Of course watched him. I watched the Yankees most nights anyway. I tried to imitate the way he did it, but I couldn’t. Baseball, as it turned out, just wasn’t my sport.

This was just one instance in which Derek Jeter was associated in my life. He’s in the lives of so many others, too, not with the Yankees or And1 or any other entity, but with the game itself; baseball as a sport, the game that we all love.

His career is coming to an end, and there are those who say that it does not deserve the intense, incessant attention it has been getting. But this level of coverage is not given to those who do not warrant it. ESPN does not spend pieces of SportCenter every night reporting on a Connecticut man’s trips to the driving range. So the question must be asked, with as little bias as possible, but with context in mind: why does Derek Jeter matter?

There is the place that the Yankees have in the recent and ancient history of the game, for better or for worse, and the place that their stars have to occupy in the baseball zeitgeist. As George Will declared in Ken Burns’ Baseball; “The best thing for baseball is for the Yankees to be contenders, but eventually lose in the end,” and this statement, even as a lifelong Yankee fan, is true; the seasons of 2001 to 2004 had some of the most eventful and exciting playoff series ever. Over the course of that four-year period, the Yankees made three ALCSs, two World Series and won exactly zero championships. But those playoffs saw the crowning of young kings of baseball, the destruction of decades of despair and an excitement of competition that had not existed since 1991, with the emergence of the Braves and then Yankees.

This period of competitive excellence was preceded by baseball’s last true dynasty; four New York championships in five years. These two eras were dominated by the Yankees, and they were, championship or not, one of, if not the most intimidating teams in baseball.

Jeter presided over all of this, took part in its most powerful and memorable moments, and was excellent individually. He remained excellent until two seasons ago, a career that warrants a first-ballot induction to the Hall of Fame and a place among the best players of all time.

But that’s a career. People have them. Good ones, great ones, better ones than Derek’s have come and gone. His numbers are not one of a kind, and there will be players in the future, including guys who are playing right now (Albert Pujols, Mike Trout) who will have careers as good, if not better than he had.

There is what he, as a person and a player, means to baseball culture. He represents the innocence, the purity of the game, on and off the field. There’s poetry, dignity to the way that he plays the game, something that in a sense has been lost. He made plays that were fun to watch, and while his range decreased and his arm lost the zip that is once had, he remained looking almost exactly the same as when he broke into the league. The process of watching him age was like a tree. It doesn’t get squat or misshapen; it just develops rings, more evidence of the time that it has gone through. He never had any brush ups with the law, was never accused of using steroids, and, it seems, arrived a leader, not just for the Yankees, but for baseball. Throughout his career, he was never the most valuable player, he didn’t usually lead the league in anything, but he was the face of the game, even in a time when the most dominant players were, and occasionally still are, being accused of cheating and generally tainting the game. This is an overused term, but he’s a throwback. He’s quite possibly the last Yankee great that we’ll ever see who played exclusively for the Yankees. He’s class epitomized. He’s the King of New York. He, as Curt Schilling put it, “has always been above the fray.”

But that’s not necessarily unique. Brooks Robinson won sixteen Gold Gloves, two World Series, and was a beacon of light in the city of Baltimore. Look at Dustin Pedroia, who lives across the street from Fenway Park with his wife and sons and who is the epitome of hustle and class and everything that baseball should be. He is a player that a kid who lacks a Bo Jackson physique can look at and gain hope that he can play the game at a high level. Players have made the game better before, and they will again.

There’s who he is as a player. Not his everyday abilities, but what he represents. He remains, in an era of statistics that can make a player who was considered great across three planes–batting average, RBIs and home runs– suddenly dominant across dozens of different minute areas to the point that he is all but omnipotent on a baseball diamond statistically, a player whose legacy will be defined by the fact that he was successful in the postseason, and more specifically, that he was clutch. He got a hit when a hit was needed, when a win was needed, even if he had been below average for most of the series. His advanced fielding and batting statistics have become below average, even dreadful, in recent years, but he has not sputtered and fallen out of the picture and become a non-entity. He has weathered the storm better than any player in recent history.

But perhaps he should have worn. Baseball is a sport obsessed with its own history, but it is rarely interested in having the history be lived unless it has something immediate to offer. There is a YouTube clip in which every mentioning of the name “Derek Jeter” is cut together, and the video title mentions that Tony Gwynn was not mentioned anywhere in the broadcast. Now, just as Mariano Rivera did not ask for a celebration in his honor last year, Jeter did not ask for one this year, but nonetheless the nonstop singing of his praises during the All-Star Game was regarded as indulgent and unnecessary. There is a very simple explanation for the grumblings of the fans. Jeter is not excellent this year, as Rivera was last year, when he finished with 44 saves at age 43. He did not earn the praise in the short term. He is batting second on a third place team with a .276 batting average and a .379 OBP (both of those numbers are well below his career stats in those areas). He is sputtering. As the season progresses, it’s becoming clearer that he is, as Mariano was last year, a star descending. But unlike Mariano, he is not gliding. He is plummeting, sort of, not into disaster but rather into mediocrity. In this world of the moment, when a player’s worth is decided by his game-to-game performance, he does not matter. Nor does he matter to baseball today. The Yankees will not make the postseason, and even if they do, there will be no return to the World Series, no more Jeffrey Maier home runs, no more The Flips. He will end his career with a whimper, like Mariano did last year, just a big name on a bad team.

Then there is the fact of who he is. He is the face of a team that, while undeniably important to the history of the game, is disliked by every other team, and every other fanbase. Just like his career, dislike of New York peaked at a time when the Yankees were the best in baseball, and so could handle the hate, but they are no longer invincible. This year, they are not just disliked but they are also old, expensive and not fun to watch. Some would say, just like Jeter. If, as it would seem, the Yankees follow Jeter and mirror his accomplishments and abilities, and if the Yankees this year do not matter in an AL race that is being fought between two teams on the West Coast and Miguel Cabrera paired with three Cy Young pitchers in the middle of the country, then Jeter, too, does not matter.

Then there is the fact of who else exists in baseball today. You have young players who are fast and strong and can outdo Jeter in literally every facet of the game. They are monsters of Sabermetrics, not helped by them physically, or even statistically (stats are the baseball equivalent of “ball don’t lie”) but perhaps in terms of their reputations. I saw part of an Angels game and saw Mike Trout strike out on three pitches, two fastballs that he could not handle and a changeup that he swung through so violently that it seemed like he would break his own back, and was then told that strikeouts are the least damaging type of out you can make. In a place where he is no longer the best, or even close to the best, at any particular skill, and where he is not measured by his intangibles, Jeter does not matter.

But when he leaves the game less than two months from now, the game will be different, changed in a way that will not be evident on a day-to-day level. Jeter is the last remainder of a different era in baseball. He has five championship rings, the most of any active player. David Ortiz, 38 years old but still doggedly productive, has three, and several players have two. But this next chapter in baseball history will lack players who have been to the highest stage before. They will not, at a young age, have had the success that will make them accustomed to the high stakes of the playoffs. His leaving resets the natural order, the mythic cycle of baseball. A new generation emerges when he leaves, new faces of the game; and those faces, especially Mike Trout, will have worn number 2 growing up. As the face of baseball, despite playing in an age when so many people played and lived the game the wrong way, Jeter did it right, and became a role model as a result. Through his sheer visibility at his prime, he will have given the new generation an idea of what success is like, how to live the superstar life the right way. Perhaps not directly, but in time, Jeter will have mattered.

So this statement is written not as a Yankee fan, but just a fan of the National Pastime; shouldn’t he matter a little bit now, before he becomes just another player who was great way back when? Shouldn’t he be given a standing ovation for making the plays that kids imitate over and over? Because those kids are growing and grown up, and when, ten years from now, we see baseball being played and represented the right way, we will be cheering on Derek Jeter, and he will matter.

You Can Never Have Enough Pitching, or, How to Eat Steak on a Hamburger Budget

By Mike Griffin
Staff Writer

The past 24 hours have been a roller coaster for the Oakland Athletics. They traded away their star left fielder for one of the best left-handers in the game, and in doing so sacrificed offense for a chance at a deep postseason run. This move was the coup de gras of a season in which Oakland has discovered the missing ingredient to a true contender; good starting pitching.

The A’s have been more or less a winning ball club for as long as they have existed. They make it to the postseason regularly, but have not won the Pennant since 1990, when the Reds swept them in the World Series. Since 2002, however, when the A’s had a trio of pitchers who won at least 15 games (Mulder, Zito and Hudson) they have made it out of the Division Series only once in five playoff appearances. The team has lost in the Division Series each of the past two seasons.

There is a simple reason for this lack of playoff staying power; the A’s have built a franchise on spending as little money as possible, whereas good starting pitching costs money — more so than any other position in baseball.

As we have seen through this 2014 trade deadline, elite starters are a necessity for all teams looking to contend. In 2009, the Philadelphia Phillies, looking to make a World Series run, and despite a strong pitching staff that included Roy Halladay, Cole Hamels and Pedro Martinez, made a move and acquired Cliff Lee, one of the best left-handers in the game. This year the Cardinals, in the midst of the closest division race, decided to sacrifice young pitching and a key member of their lineup to get John Lackey, a decent, aging starter, but one with ample postseason experience.

For years the A’s, with the little money that they had to spend, did not jump on available starters who could have helped them in the postseason. Then, like clockwork, Oakland would get bounced from the playoffs early. Because their system was based on advanced statistics, and in many ways different from every other team in baseball, was dismissed as ineffective.

But this year, Billy Beane has found a way to reconcile his dislike of big time spending and his need for big time pitching. To compliment Oakland’s two top pitchers from the beginning of the season, Scott Kazmir and Sonny Gray, he has traded for Jeff Samardzjia, Jason Hammel and Jon Lester, all above-average to fantastic level pitchers, at or near the end of their contracts. What this means is that he doesn’t have to pay these big arms big money in the long term if he doesn’t want to, but could have an upper hand in working contract extensions before the pitchers become free agents.

The one thing that ruins the A’s financial position is a bloated contract for a star. It’s why they have allowed several stars that blossomed in their organization, from Jason Giambi to Barry Zito to Nick Swisher, to leave Oakland in search of more robust financial opportunities. Furthermore, Beane has traded away his one real star, Yoenis Cespedes, who he signed to an uncharacteristically large contract when Cespedes arrived in the league, and replaced him with Sam Fuld, a player with a comparable batting average and OBP but a substantially smaller contract. Essentially, Beane has managed to rid himself of an oversized contract while adding top-tier talent, allowing him to exercise more payroll his starting rotation.

This is a noted change from the way the A’s set up their pitching staff in previous years. During each of the previous two seasons, the A’s ran rotations of largely unproven and unknown pitchers like A.J. Griffin, Travis Blackley and Jarrod Parker (Bartolo Colon is an exception). In 2012, seven different pitchers started 10 or more games for the A’s, and that defined rotation posted a combined 3.90 ERA. In 2013, six different pitchers started 10 or more games, and posted a 3.53 ERA, then a 4.10 ERA in the playoffs. Of those six pitchers, only two, Colon and Sonny Gray, are still pitching in the major leagues. Now, they have a rotation that includes the all-time leader in World Series ERA, a former AL strikeout leader, and two of the most surprisingly dominant young pitchers in the major leagues, without paying excessive money in the long term. In other words, they have figured out the source of their playoff woes, and have taken steps to rectify the situation without sacrificing their principles.

This change in the A’s game plan comes at a time when their two biggest contenders are two of the more traditionally run organizations in baseball; the L.A. Angels and the Detroit Tigers. They have position player units built around a combination of the products of blockbuster deals (Miguel Cabrera, Ian Kinsler, Josh Hamilton and Albert Pujols) and young stars that are the cream of the organization’s farm system crop (Mike Trout, Nick Castellanos). In addition, they possess bigger names, and have made it a priority to sign and then pay accordingly for stars.

Normally, the starting pitching staffs of these two teams blew the A’s out of the water, especially the Tigers, whose starting staffs posted ERAs of 3.60 and 3.38 in 2012 and 2013, respectively, to the A’s 3.9 and 3.53 ERAs over that same period (it’s worth noting here that the Tigers have eliminated the Athletics from the playoffs the last three times Oakland has made it to the postseason). This year is different.

Bt5lBPaIgAAairA

via espn.com

The current Athletics starting pitching staff, now that they’ve added Jon Lester, is notably more effective than the Detroit’s, with an ERA of 2.86 compared with the Tigers’ 3.59. The trend has effectively been reversed.

The A’s lead the league in runs and RBIs, while the Tigers are fifth in both categories. The potent A’s offense, combined with this newly dominant pitching staff, makes them a team capable of winning deep in the postseason, but while paying less money than all but five teams. Detroit’s payroll is the fourth highest in baseball, and more than twice the size of Oakland’s. What all of this points to is that this is Oakland’s year. Everything is in place. Now all they need is a postseason to prove their worth. They will likely face a Detroit team that has also been loading up their rotation. Detroit has bigger names, three Cy Young winners, but the present, and the statistics, are on Oakland’s side.

It will be a battle of the old and the new, the traditional and the innovative. But there is a feeling in the air, that this will be the validation of years of trying to make baseball work with as few extra pieces as possible.